Testimonials are the type of "validation" that is used primarily in advertising. The "evidence" for TFT falls into three general categories: (1) testimonials, (2) anecdotal case studies, and (3) methodologically flawed research. This is because there has been no effort on the part of Callahan to reject his theory through testable and experimentally investigated means.Ī Review of the "Evidence" in Favor of TFT Specifically, no real accumulation of scientific knowledge has developed concerning the merits of TFT since its inception over 20 years ago. Finally, even if it proves effective to some degree, no evidence has been shown that would indicate that Callahan's unsupported theory is the correct explanation for any results.Ĭonversely, TFT fails to meet the definition of science. Up to this point, such comparisons have never been made. More importantly, we also do not know if it works better than validated methods when compared head-to-head. We even lack scientific evidence that would show that it works at all, or anything close to the success rates that are claimed. No studies experimentally investigating the effectiveness of TFT compared with other credible treatments have been published in any respectable scientific journals. TFT also meets the second condition of a pseudoscience, because after 20 years of development, it still lacks even the simplest forms of scientific evidence. However, Callahan actually distorts the original concept of the body's "energy fields" to account for all psychological disorders.
Tft thought field therapy verification#
In addition, Callahan's theory is based on concepts from Chinese medicine which, after thousands of years, still lack convincing scientific verification of its theoretical basis. Callahan takes an unrelated concept and uses it in an unintended way that has no scientific support. However, the key word in the definition of a pseudoscience is that it "appears" scientific. By misinterpreting Bohm's concept of "active information," Callahan attempts to base his unorthodox techniques firmly in the realm of physics. First, the theory behind TFT uses the guise of science. It can be argued that TFT meets both of the criteria presented above that define pseudoscience. Again according to Shermer, science is a process that involves the "cumulative growth of a system of knowledge over time, in which useful features are retained and nonuseful features are abandoned, based on the rejection or confirmation of testable knowledge" (p. However, in order to understand what makes a pseudoscience false we must first define what science is. In other words, pseudoscience is literally a "false science." In his book Why People Believe Weird Things (1997), Shermer defines pseudoscience as " claims presented so that they appear scientific even though they lack supporting evidence and plausibility" (p. Michael Shermer, Ph.D., is a noted skeptic and the director of The Skeptic's Society.
0 kommentar(er)
